top of page
Writer's picturePaullett Golden

A Gentleman's Education in the 18th Century

Publication Date: Jan 1, 2020


Would the hero attend a local school, be sent to a private school, have a tutor, or...?

Painting of two boys at school
The Drummond Brothers, Benjamin West PRA, 1769, 04/1913, Royal Academy of Arts

We read quite a bit in historical romances that the hero attended Eton, then Oxford, and at some point tootled off for the Grand Tour. But did the education for an heir look the same as that of his younger brothers' education? Did the education of aristocrats look the same as those of landed gentry? What did villagers do for education?

Let's answer these questions simply: the education not only differed for all parties, the means by which they were educated also differed.


Heirs would inherit, and thus they had to be prepared for what to do when that occurred, which could really be any minute, if we're speaking truthfully. Their education focused on their duties and roles, their virtues and morals, their behavior and manners, not to mention diplomacy, and their running of the estate and lands. Scholastic pursuits were important, but more so was their ability to lead, negotiate, network, and converse. The academic studies would include languages (written and oral) such as French, Latin, Greek, German, etc., as well as such subjects as music, history, geography, rhetoric, and more. It was rare that heirs were sent off to school, such as attending Eton. Instead, they had personal tutors from an early age. They were, essentially, home schooled, but by a tutor whose sole purpose was to educate the heir for inheritance. Not only did education by tutor assure the heir received bespoke lessons, but both the discipline and socialization would be monitored. We can't have the future duke socializing with someone below his station at school, now can we? It says a great deal about what the parents valued if they chose to send their heir or even the younger sons to a public school versus home school. A parent could, for instance, want their son(s) to mix with other classes. Something to think about, eh?

Painting of two boys in a tutoring session
Francis Ayscough with the Prince of Wales (later King George III) and Edward Augustus, Duke of York and Albany by Richard Wilson, National Portrait Gallery, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

And just to clarify, a school like Eton would be considered "public" because it was not exclusive to aristocrats. Anyone with means could attend, even the underprivileged (often for free if they showed sufficient talent). Eton, as with the other public schools, comes with a hefty annual tuition which includes their room and board since students stay for most of the year. What we consider to be "private" would have been monastery schools. There were more exclusive public schools, but it would have been more reasonable to keep the son at home with a tutor. The typical age of first admission to Eton is age 13, although some may not attend until much older, say 16. While there were certainly more options than Eton, Eton was the more popular of choices since it was openly supported and promoted by the King.


Photography of Eton
Eton, Aerial Picture of Eton College, Berkshire by John Crampton, 2008, https://www.picturesofengland.com/England/Berkshire/Eton/pictures/1065936

A few notes on schools like Eton and the ages of attendance before we venture further. It was not until the 1830s when the age of enrollment was set for public schools to be 13-18, and that was done due to the creation of preparatory schools. During the Georgian era, there was no such thing. Our education options during the Georgian era include:

  • Private tutor

  • Family educated by parents, sibling, relation

  • Village school taught by a volunteer (typically a military pensioner or the local clergyman, be he curate, vicar, or rector)

  • Apprenticeship for a trade

  • Public school, ie one of the 7: Eton, Harrow, Winchester, Westminster, Rugby, Shrewsbury, Charterhouse


Which of these, or even in which combination, a young man received for his education depended on his familial obligations, his family's household income, his future plans (university, military, other), etc. Since there was no preparatory schools, there was no age of enrollment. For some, Eton (or one of the others) might be their first foray into education, while for others, it might be a stop between private tutoring and university. During the Georgian era, it was more common for the age of enrollment to be pre-teen. Five was the youngest recorded age at Eton, specifically, but 7-10 was common for enrollment, especially if this was to be their formative education. For those with a private tutor, household obligations, or otherwise, they may not enroll until much later, say as late as 16. For a few example ages of high profile figures during the Georgian era, check out this lovely post by Jo Beverly from the Word Wenches.


For what purpose a pupil was attending school not only determined his age of enrollment but also his age of completion. For those heading to the military, they may only stay for a year or two, and then go straight into the military. For those who plan to attend university, their matriculation would be based on readiness rather than age. If they were academically ready for university at a shockingly young age, then off they would go. It was more common to complete schooling at a young age than not. The education of the era was personalized, not standardized, as it is now, so it was about readiness, not age. Now, we have strict standardizations of which school to attend during which age. That was not the case in the Georgian era. A pupil received the education that met their academic and readiness need, regardless of age, and so one person may finish university at age 15 while someone else doesn't finish until 25 and still yet another never bothered to attend because he received his education entirely by private tutor. For more about university, especially why someone would want or not want to attend since it held a different function than it does now, check out my post on a university education in the Georgian era.


While we're mentioning public schools, let's pause for a moment to mention village schools, which were certainly not in every village, but also not uncommon during the Age of Enlightenment. They were typically run by the local clergy. There was even mention in The Baron and The Enchantress of Dr. John Sharp holding school in Bamburgh Castle, if you'll recall, a mention based on truth, as Dr. Sharp really did hold a village school in the castle. If there was someone interested in holding classes, then pupils would attend, always free of charge, but not necessarily with regularity. The lower the family's status, the more likely the children would be working with little or no time for education (and really, some might ask what the point would be to have a scholarly education when you already knew your future trade and were either doing it or apprenticing in it. Putting food on the table was seen as far more important than learning Latin.).

The younger brothers (we're back to talking about aristocratic families, by the way) would have to fend for themselves in the world, and so were educated with the intention of leaving home to make their own way. They might at first have the advantage of their eldest brother's tutor, but at some point, they would more than likely be sent to a private or public school wherein they would learn the skills to become clerics, doctors, barristers, or even military officers. Academic pursuits at the public schools were not skimped on, as these students were still learning Latin, Greek, Horace, Virgil, studying law, mathematics, logic, rhetoric, languages, science, and other joys of a classical education. You can imagine, then, the difficulty of a young brother inheriting. The younger siblings, unless they were considered "the spare" and educated just in case, rarely received the same education as the eldest and heir. A younger son could spend the entirety of his youth studying to become a vicar only to end up with the entire inheritance in his lap--talk about unprepared!

Photograph of Oxford
Oxford, iStock

Once the youthful schooling was out of the way, there was the option of attending university. Emphasis on option. Oxford was the more popular choice for aristocrats but not the only choice. We might find one of our heroes having attended Cambridge, the University of Edinburgh, or any number of other universities abroad. Oxford was especially popular with those families aligned with the Tories (Crown supporters), while Cambridge was associated more with the Whigs (parliament supporters). Historically speaking, especially in terms of our hist rom heroes, it's most likely that the heir and his brothers would attend Oxford, while the local landed gentry would attend Cambridge. That's not necessarily a class thing but a political thing (although the line between those two is rather thin). And of course, there are always exceptions when it comes to political leanings.

It was not uncommon for children or young adults to attend school abroad rather than at home, be it for their public schooling or for university. Often, sons attended the same university as their father and his father before him, but there were the occasional rebels who made sure not to follow in their father's footsteps. Gentry who wished to attend university but could not readily afford it or have the political connections could obtain a scholarship. With aptitude, anyone could attend university (and public school, for that matter). Degrees were of little importance, for there was not really a reason to earn a degree. The goal was the education itself, so those attending university stayed until they were satisfied or went broke. Some stayed a year, some two years, etc. all studying under the tutelage of learned individuals. It should be noted that the same did not apply to universities abroad, for many of those had strict curricula with terminal degrees. Someone wishing to become a doctor, for instance, would likely attend a medical university abroad.



Painting of Gentlemen in Rome by Katharine Read
British Gentlemen in Rome by Katharine Read, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

The Grand Tour followed university and was not a frolic on the continent for drink and women, although I'm sure there was that in plenty. The Grand Tour served an educational purpose and typically lasted at least three years. It was the final component of education wherein they studied the culture and politics of other countries, networked with aristocrats abroad, examined architecture, embodied what they had been taught in terms of manners, language, diplomacy, and more. For many, this served as a sort of dissertation, thesis, or capstone project to finalize their education, a real test and testament to their education thus far. There were academic goals involved, and specific countries and sights they were encouraged to see as part of the journey. Visiting the courts was part of the experience, as well, not only to see the political workings of other countries but to be part of it as an educated and decorous representative of England. Purchasing furniture, clothing, art, etc. while on tour was part of the experience. It was not uncommon that their personal tutor traveled with them to continue the lessons and document their progress. Preparing for the trip was quite the undertaking and may prove a good post for another newsletter, for the passports, papers, and money was serious business for the Englishman traveling abroad for an extended time, especially if accompanied by his tutor, as would be more common than not.

We see in The Colonel and The Enchantress some discussion of education. Duncan's education is mentioned, and there are some hints to the education of other children, such as the heir of the Annick dukedom. These are areas in which Mary's background and Duncan's background greatly differ, not to mention how they might want to raise their children--village school? Private tutor? Eton? Oxford?

bottom of page